ফৌজদারি আপিলে তামাদি আইন

- Rafiqur Rahman Patwary

criminal

Published On - July 3, 2014 [Vol. 1, Jul - Dec, 2014]

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. An eum discere ea mavis, quae cum plane perdidiceriti nihil sciat? Praetereo multos, in bis doctum hominem et suavem, Hieronymum, quem iam cur Peripateticum appellem nescio. Hic, qui utrumque probat, ambobus debuit uti, sicut facit re, neque tamen dividit verbis. Quid dubitas igitur mutare principia naturae?

Quis enim potest istis, quae te, ut ais, delectant, brevibus et acutis auditis de sententia decedere? Sed nonne merninisti licere mihi ista probare, quae sunt a te dicta? Ita cum ea volunt retinere, quae superiori sententiae conveniunt, in Aristonem incidunt; Ab hoc autem quaedam non melius quam veteres, quaedam omnino relicta. An tu me de L. Amicitiae vero locus ubi esse potest aut quis amicus esse cuiquam, quem non ipsum amet propter ipsum? Varietates autem iniurasque fortunae facile veteres philosophorum praeceptis instituta vita superabat. Hoc loco tenere se Triarius non potuit.

Cuius quidem, quoniam Stoicus fuit, sententia condemnata mihi videtur esse inanitas ista verborum. Virtutibus igitur rectissime mihi videris et ad consuetudinem nostrae orationis vitia posuisse contraria. Si verbum sequimur, primum longius verbum praepositum quam bonum. Haec mihi videtur delicatior, ut ita dicam, molliorque ratio, quam virtutis vis gravitasque postulat. Hic quoque suus est de summoque bono dissentiens dici vere Peripateticus non potest. Quid, si reviviscant Platonis illi et deinceps qui eorum auditores fuerunt, et tecum ita loquantur? Occultum facinus esse potuerit, gaudebit; Id enim ille summum bonum eu)qumi/an et saepe a)qambi/an appellat, id est animum terrore liberum.

Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quo studio cum satiari non possint, omnium ceterarum rerum obliti níhil abiectum, nihil humile cogitant; Si quidem, inquit, tollerem, sed relinquo. Illud urgueam, non intellegere eum quid sibi dicendum sit, cum dolorem summum malum esse dixerit. Sin kakan malitiam dixisses, ad aliud nos unum certum vitium consuetudo Latina traduceret. Rem unam praeclarissimam omnium maximeque laudandam, penitus viderent, quonam gaudio complerentur, cum tantopere eius adumbrata opinione laetentur? Fortitudinis quaedam praecepta sunt ac paene leges, quae effeminari virum vetant in dolore. Facit enim ille duo seiuncta ultima bonorum, quae ut essent vera, coniungi debuerunt; Quid autem habent admirationis, cum prope accesseris? Nec enim, dum metuit, iustus est, et certe, si metuere destiterit, non erit; Pompeius in foedere Numantino infitiando fuit, nec vero omnia timente, sed primum qui animi conscientiam non curet, quam scilicet comprimere nihil est negotii. Nonne videmus quanta perturbatio rerum omnium consequatur, quanta confusio?

Ego vero isti, inquam, permitto. Ut in voluptate sit, qui epuletur, in dolore, qui torqueatur. Dicuntur ista, Cato, magnifice, inquam, sed videsne verborum gloriam tibi cum Pyrrhone et cum Aristone, qui omnia exaequant, esse communem? Ita ceterorum sententiis semotis relinquitur non mihi cum Torquato, sed virtuti cum voluptate certatio. Quam vellem, inquit, te ad Stoicos inclinavisses! erat enim, si cuiusquam, certe tuum nihil praeter virtutem in bonis ducere. Age, inquies, ista parva sunt. Nisi autem rerum natura perspecta erit, nullo modo poterimus sensuum iudicia defendere. Respondent extrema primis, media utrisque, omnia omnibus.

About The Writer

Article Author Image

Rafiqur Rahman Patwary

District & Sessions Judge (Retd.) Advocate, Supreme Court of Bangladesh

rafiqurrahman19@yahoo.com

Share:  



Welcome To "Law Journal BD"

Rafiqul Haque

“Law Journal BD” is a timely and innovative step towards the growth and development of law. The Journal is a combination of articles from experts which will broaden the scope of our legal instrument and jurisprudence. I sincerely hope the initiative will help the lawyers to be more informed & committed to struggle for justice. It would be more appropriate to consider it as a work of compilation of contributions from various jurists, practitioners and academicians. The “Law Journal BD” publishes articles on all aspects of law.

I deeply appreciate the efforts of the Editor and the whole team of “Law Journal BD”. It is a great contribution to Bangladesh judiciary. The journal publishes articles on all areas of law and I believe the articles will be very helpful to researchers, legal scholars, practitioners, law consultants and moreover to Law students. I am really thankful to both , who are contributing their valuable articles for publication and who are reading the articles for enhancing knowledge of law.


Thanks to all the readers of “Law Journal BD”.


Barrister Rafique - Ul Huq

Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of Bangladesh

Chief Advisor, “Law Journal BD”

Mahfuzur Rahman

The “Law Journal BD” is the first Online Law journal in Bangladesh which specifically publishes law articles only. You will find here different kind of research based articles on various Law topics. The primary function of the journal is to publish lengthy comprehensive treatments of articles generally written by law academicians, Judges, or legal practitioners. A significant feature is that the distinguished writers analyze judicial decisions, contemporary developments of law, legislation and current law reform.

The important features of the journal are the sections of Book Review and Biography of renowned person in legal field. The articles are published as a six months volume & then it will be found in the “Previous Publications” section. The “Law Journal BD” has the efficient team of learned advisors and experienced team of editors. All articles are subjected to a rigorous editorial process in order to strengthen substance, polish tone and ensure citation accuracy.



We thank you sincerely for reading “Law Journal BD”.


Barrister Md. Mahfuzur Rahman (Milon)

Advocate, Supreme Court of Bangladesh

Editor, “Law Journal BD”